CHICAGO, IL: It is forbidden to fish while sitting on a giraffe’s neck.
ALABAMA: You may not have an ice cream cone in your back pocket at any time.
OHIO: It is illegal to fish for whales on Sunday—in Ohio!
We’ve all chuckled at them, mused about testing their enforcement, and opined as to the brainpan capacity of the legislators who passed these so-called “dumb laws”. There are many blog sites devoted to disseminating them, most showing no evidence as to the title, chapter or text of these legislative larks.
A little research reveals that most of these laws don’t exist. They are as much a part of urban lore as the lady who dried her wet poodle in the microwave. Some exist, but have been distorted so as to no longer reflect their original intent.
In Alaska, for example, they say, “It is illegal to tie a dog to the roof of your car.”
An insurance company Web site quotes the above law as being CAC 9.36.150, the actual text of which reads quite differently:
No person driving a motor vehicle shall transport any animal in the back of the vehicle in a space intended for any load on the vehicle on a street unless the space is enclosed or has side and tail walls to a height of at least 46 inches extending vertically from the floor, or the animal is cross tethered to the vehicle, or is protected by a secured container or cage, in a manner which will prevent the animal from being thrown, falling or jumping from the vehicle.
To make a sales pitch, the insurance company racked a tortured interpretation out of the original meaning of this regulation, and its torn remains were tossed onto a number of Dumb Law blog sites.
As opposed to mythical regulations, statutes and ordinances, I would like to know what’s behind the actual dumb laws that pass through many state legislatures.
Very recent examples are:

WISCONSIN: The state has been experiencing a fiscal crisis that includes collective bargaining protests, fleeing senators and recall petitions. Yet, the Badger State just passed legislation declaring the cream puff as the “official state dessert”. A Republican Senator introduced the bill, which outraged the Democrats, who failed in their attempt to name Lactococcus lactis, responsible for cheddar, as the “official state microbe”.
FLORIDA: With 11.1% unemployment, you might think that the legislature would have plenty to deliberate, and you would be right. On the governor’s desk is Senate Bill 228, which forbids school students from “wearing clothing that exposes underwear or body parts in an indecent or vulgar manner or that disrupts the orderly learning environment.” The lawmakers’ hidebound obsession with baggy pants, boxer shorts and butt cracks would indicate that this ebbing fad is somehow devastating the Sunshine State. Maybe we should start calling it the Moonstruck State!
When the nation is undergoing economic hardship, high unemployment and unprecedented weather emergencies, do lawmakers really have time for this nonsense?
Is spending time on such fatuous legislation a sign that elected officials are avoiding their duties, that they are not up to the task, or is it a signal that they are totally out of touch with their constituents? Certainly, legislative bodies will always have their share of inane proposals, but what does it say when they give those bills attention over and above issues that profoundly impact the welfare of those they represent?