EPA proposes regulation of coal ash

by jflowers 12. May 2010

For the first time, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is proposing regulations for the safe disposal and management of coal ash from coal-fired power plants.

The proposal focuses on two options for addressing the risks of coal ash management under the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act. One option is drawn from authorities available under Subtitle C, which creates a comprehensive program of federally enforceable requirements for waste management and disposal. The other option includes remedies under Subtitle D, which gives EPA authority to set performance standards for waste management facilities and would be enforced primarily through citizen suits.


Under both approaches, the agency would retain the Bevill exemption for beneficial uses of coal ash, in which coal combustion residuals are recycled as components of products instead of placed in impoundments or landfills.

 

Coal combustion residuals, commonly known as coal ash, are byproducts of the combustion of coal at power plants and are disposed of in liquid form at large surface impoundments and in solid form at landfills. The residuals contain contaminants like mercury, cadmium and arsenic, which are associated with cancer and various other serious health effects. EPA’s risk assessment and damage cases demonstrate that, without proper protections, these contaminants can leach into groundwater and can migrate to drinking water sources, posing significant health public concerns.

 

The public comment period is 90 days from the date the rule is published in the Federal Register.

For more information, visit http://www.epa.gov/coalashrule.

Tags: , , , ,

news

Comments (2) -

environmental sustainability
environmental sustainability United States
10/23/2010 2:15:39 AM #

it is evil because there is to much natural land being taken over by the countries to make houses, industries ETC as well as pollution its not good we need to keep as much natural land as we can

environmental sustainability United States | Reply

Coal Portal
Coal Portal Australia
8/25/2011 8:55:01 AM #

The investment into alternative power generating technologies such as nuclear energy may need to be measured against the potential cost when things turn against you as unfortunately happened this year  in Japan. The use of thermal coal (steam coal) that is mostly burnt for power generation may be valid for other countries who may not be able to allocate resources and funds to alternative and more greener sources of power.  Coal  newsletters and coal statistics show developing economies are more likely to increase their investment into & their use of thermal coal & metallurgical coal in coming years because of coal's affordability and ability to quickly meet increasing demands for electricity and steel.  Cherry of www.coalportal.com

Coal Portal Australia | Reply

Pingbacks and trackbacks (1)+

Add comment

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading